What Is My One-Rep Max if I Lift 365 lb for 3 Reps?

365 lb for 3 reps, run through all seven published formulas — median 398 lb, and the 30 lb they disagree by shown rather than hidden.

Estimated one-rep max398lb

median of seven formulas — the full range is 386 to 416 lb

Lowest of the seven 386 lb
Highest of the seven 416 lb
Your set was 92% of max

The set you actually did
lb
Units

The formulas are ratios, so the unit only changes the label — 225 kg for 5 works exactly like 225 lb for 5.

Every one-rep-max formula applied to this set
FormulaEquationEstimate
Brzycki 386 lb
O'Conner 392 lb
Lander 391 lb
Wathan 398 lb
Epley 402 lb
Lombardi 407 lb
Mayhew 416 lb

Fitted on sets of 2 to 10 reps. Above 10 the estimates drift apart and none of them is dependable.

This calculator needs JavaScript to recalculate. The answer shown above was worked out when the page was built and is correct for the date in the address bar.

Last checked

398 lb works out to 3x45 + 1x35 + 1x5 per side plus the bar — call it 395 lb in practice, since gyms rarely stock the odd change. 3 reps sits at the reliable end of the range these formulas were fitted on, so the 30 lb spread here is about as tight as the method gets. Your 365 lb set represents about 92% of the estimated max.

Why 3 reps gives a tight estimate

A triple is close to the best case for this method. The low end of the two-to-ten band is where these regressions were sampled most heavily, and it shows here — the seven land within 30 lb of each other, 7.5% of the estimate, which is small enough that choosing a different formula would not change how you train. If the third rep slowed down but the bar never stalled, 398 lb is a defensible working number.

Training loads from a 398 lb max

Programmes are written as percentages of the max, not as absolute weights. From 398 lb, rounded to the nearest 5 lb:

PercentageLoadTypical set
95%380 lbHeavy single
90%360 lbDoubles and triples
85%340 lbSets of four to five
80%320 lbSets of six
75%300 lbSets of eight
70%280 lbVolume work, ten or more

398 lb is 3x45 + 1x35 + 1x5 per side plus the bar, 395 lb loaded. At this load the 30 lb the formulas disagree by is bigger than a pair of 10s, which is a good argument for programming off the lower estimate — 386 lb — and letting the bar prove you wrong rather than the other way round. Warm-up jumps also get long here; work up in percentages rather than in fixed plate increments.

The formulas behind this answer, and their limitations

The table above the fold is Epley (1985), Brzycki (1993), Lombardi (1989), O'Conner (1989), Wathan (1994), Lander (1985) and Mayhew (1992), each applied to 365 lb for 3 reps; the headline figure is their median. All seven assume a set taken close to failure with clean technique. At 3 reps you are inside the band they were fitted on, so the largest error here is not the equation but judging how close your set really was to failure — three reps left in the tank reads exactly the same to them. They also under-rate strong, experienced lifters, who hold a higher percentage of max at any rep count than the regression average. The full account — the populations behind each equation, what a bounced rep does to it, and why we stop at ten reps — is set out on the methodology page. Warm up thoroughly and use safety bars or a spotter before going anywhere near 398 lb. This is a training estimate, not medical advice.

Common questions

365 lb for 3 reps is what one-rep max?

About 398 lb. The seven standard formulas range from 386 to 416 lb on these inputs, so the honest answer is “somewhere around 398”. In practice that is 3x45 + 1x35 + 1x5 per side plus the bar, or 395 lb loaded. Your 365 lb set is roughly 92% of that estimated max.

Why do the seven formulas disagree by 30 lb?

Each was fitted on a different group of lifters doing a different lift, so they curve differently as reps climb. At 3 reps that comes to 7.5%. Most calculators pick one of the seven silently; the spread is itself information about how much the number deserves to be trusted. All seven written out.

Should I try to lift 398 lb?

Not on the strength of an estimate from a 3-rep set, and not cold. A short set gives the tightest estimate this method produces, but 398 lb is still an extrapolation from 365 lb — work up to it over several weeks rather than in one session. Make small jumps near the top, and set safety bars or use a spotter. If the point is to programme your training rather than to test, you do not need to attempt it at all — use the percentages above and adjust when your working sets start moving easily.