What Is My One-Rep Max if I Lift 265 lb for 4 Reps?

265 lb for 4 reps, run through all seven published formulas — median 299 lb, and the 20 lb they disagree by shown rather than hidden.

Estimated one-rep max299lb

median of seven formulas — the full range is 289 to 309 lb

Lowest of the seven 289 lb
Highest of the seven 309 lb
Your set was 89% of max

The set you actually did
lb
Units

The formulas are ratios, so the unit only changes the label — 225 kg for 5 works exactly like 225 lb for 5.

Every one-rep-max formula applied to this set
FormulaEquationEstimate
Brzycki 289 lb
O'Conner 292 lb
Lander 292 lb
Wathan 299 lb
Epley 300 lb
Lombardi 304 lb
Mayhew 309 lb

Fitted on sets of 2 to 10 reps. Above 10 the estimates drift apart and none of them is dependable.

This calculator needs JavaScript to recalculate. The answer shown above was worked out when the page was built and is correct for the date in the address bar.

Last checked

299 lb works out to 2x45 + 1x35 per side plus the bar — call it 295 lb in practice, since gyms rarely stock the odd change. 4 reps sits comfortably inside the 2-to-10 range these formulas were fitted on, so this estimate is about as reliable as the method gets. Your 265 lb set represents about 89% of the estimated max.

How far 299 lb can be trusted

Four reps still sits in the well-behaved part of the range. The seven equations return 289 to 309 lb, and most of that 6.7% gap is them disagreeing about how fast strength falls off with reps rather than any of them being wrong. A set of four is also long enough that fatigue in the last rep is visible: if rep four was a grind, this estimate is honest; if it moved easily, 299 lb is on the low side.

Training loads from a 299 lb max

Programmes are written as percentages of the max, not as absolute weights. From 299 lb, rounded to the nearest 5 lb:

PercentageLoadTypical set
95%285 lbHeavy single
90%270 lbDoubles and triples
85%255 lbSets of four to five
80%240 lbSets of six
75%225 lbSets of eight
70%210 lbVolume work, ten or more

299 lb is 2x45 + 1x35 per side plus the bar — 295 lb loaded. Plate maths gets easier at this weight, because most of the jumps land on whole 10s and 25s. The bottom three rows of that table are worth rounding generously; the top two are where you want to be precise, since 5 lb at 95% of 299 lb is the difference between a single and a missed single.

The formulas behind this answer, and their limitations

The table above the fold is Epley (1985), Brzycki (1993), Lombardi (1989), O'Conner (1989), Wathan (1994), Lander (1985) and Mayhew (1992), each applied to 265 lb for 4 reps; the headline figure is their median. All seven assume a set taken close to failure with clean technique. At 4 reps you are inside the band they were fitted on, so the largest error here is not the equation but judging how close your set really was to failure — three reps left in the tank reads exactly the same to them. They also under-rate strong, experienced lifters, who hold a higher percentage of max at any rep count than the regression average. The full account — the populations behind each equation, what a bounced rep does to it, and why we stop at ten reps — is set out on the methodology page. Warm up thoroughly and use safety bars or a spotter before going anywhere near 299 lb. This is a training estimate, not medical advice.

Common questions

265 lb for 4 reps is what one-rep max?

About 299 lb. The seven standard formulas range from 289 to 309 lb on these inputs, so the honest answer is “somewhere around 299”. In practice that is 2x45 + 1x35 per side plus the bar, or 295 lb loaded. Your 265 lb set is roughly 89% of that estimated max.

Why do the seven formulas disagree by 20 lb?

Each was fitted on a different group of lifters doing a different lift, so they curve differently as reps climb. At 4 reps that comes to 6.7%. Most calculators pick one of the seven silently; the spread is itself information about how much the number deserves to be trusted. All seven written out.

Should I try to lift 299 lb?

Not on the strength of an estimate from a 4-rep set, and not cold. A short set gives the tightest estimate this method produces, but 299 lb is still an extrapolation from 265 lb — work up to it over several weeks rather than in one session. Make small jumps near the top, and set safety bars or use a spotter. If the point is to programme your training rather than to test, you do not need to attempt it at all — use the percentages above and adjust when your working sets start moving easily.