What Is My One-Rep Max if I Lift 115 lb for 2 Reps?

115 lb for 2 reps, run through all seven published formulas — median 121 lb, and the 10 lb they disagree by shown rather than hidden.

Estimated one-rep max121lb

median of seven formulas — the full range is 118 to 128 lb

Lowest of the seven 118 lb
Highest of the seven 128 lb
Your set was 95% of max

The set you actually did
lb
Units

The formulas are ratios, so the unit only changes the label — 225 kg for 5 works exactly like 225 lb for 5.

Every one-rep-max formula applied to this set
FormulaEquationEstimate
Brzycki 118 lb
O'Conner 121 lb
Lander 120 lb
Wathan 121 lb
Epley 123 lb
Lombardi 123 lb
Mayhew 128 lb

Fitted on sets of 2 to 10 reps. Above 10 the estimates drift apart and none of them is dependable.

This calculator needs JavaScript to recalculate. The answer shown above was worked out when the page was built and is correct for the date in the address bar.

Last checked

121 lb works out to 1x35 + 1x5 per side plus the bar — call it 125 lb in practice, since gyms rarely stock the odd change. 2 reps sits at the reliable end of the range these formulas were fitted on, so the 10 lb spread here is about as tight as the method gets. Your 115 lb set represents about 95% of the estimated max.

Why 2 reps gives a tight estimate

A double is the shortest set these seven equations accept, and it is where they agree most closely. Every one of them was regressed on sets of two to ten reps, so two sits at the near edge of the fitted band rather than outside it, and the 10 lb between 118 and 128 lb is about as narrow as this method ever gets. The uncertainty at two reps is not in the arithmetic, it is in the set: a double you could have taken one rep further looks identical on paper to one that genuinely stopped you.

Training loads from a 121 lb max

Programmes are written as percentages of the max, not as absolute weights. From 121 lb, to the nearest pound, because 5 lb steps collapse into each other at this load:

PercentageLoadTypical set
95%115 lbHeavy single
90%109 lbDoubles and triples
85%103 lbSets of four to five
80%97 lbSets of six
75%91 lbSets of eight
70%85 lbVolume work, ten or more

At this end of the rack almost none of those percentages lands on a plate you own. 121 lb itself builds as 1x35 + 1x5 per side plus the bar, which is 125 lb — near enough, and the miss is smaller than the 10 lb the seven formulas disagree by. This is the weight range where a pair of 2.5 lb or 1.25 lb plates genuinely earns its place, because a 10 lb jump here is a much larger proportional step than it is at 300.

The formulas behind this answer, and their limitations

The table above the fold is Epley (1985), Brzycki (1993), Lombardi (1989), O'Conner (1989), Wathan (1994), Lander (1985) and Mayhew (1992), each applied to 115 lb for 2 reps; the headline figure is their median. All seven assume a set taken close to failure with clean technique. At 2 reps you are inside the band they were fitted on, so the largest error here is not the equation but judging how close your set really was to failure — three reps left in the tank reads exactly the same to them. They also under-rate strong, experienced lifters, who hold a higher percentage of max at any rep count than the regression average. The full account — the populations behind each equation, what a bounced rep does to it, and why we stop at ten reps — is set out on the methodology page. Warm up thoroughly and use safety bars or a spotter before going anywhere near 121 lb. This is a training estimate, not medical advice.

Common questions

115 lb for 2 reps is what one-rep max?

About 121 lb. The seven standard formulas range from 118 to 128 lb on these inputs, so the honest answer is “somewhere around 121”. In practice that is 1x35 + 1x5 per side plus the bar, or 125 lb loaded. Your 115 lb set is roughly 95% of that estimated max.

Why do the seven formulas disagree by 10 lb?

Each was fitted on a different group of lifters doing a different lift, so they curve differently as reps climb. At 2 reps that comes to 8.3%. Most calculators pick one of the seven silently; the spread is itself information about how much the number deserves to be trusted. All seven written out.

Should I try to lift 121 lb?

Not on the strength of an estimate from a 2-rep set, and not cold. A short set gives the tightest estimate this method produces, but 121 lb is still an extrapolation from 115 lb — work up to it over several weeks rather than in one session. Make small jumps near the top, and set safety bars or use a spotter. If the point is to programme your training rather than to test, you do not need to attempt it at all — use the percentages above and adjust when your working sets start moving easily.